tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6881326265222951171.post980955949551425017..comments2010-12-02T14:53:02.325+01:00Daniel Niggebruggehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02053201958307619797noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6881326265222951171.post-18313826634049157922010-12-02T14:53:02.325+01:002010-12-02T14:53:02.325+01:00http://www.hashhack.com - sorry ^ busted the link aboveAdamhttp://www.hashhack.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6881326265222951171.post-31586434029057650422010-12-02T14:52:16.970+01:002010-12-02T14:52:16.970+01:00I created an <a href="www.hashhack.com" rel="nofollow">online md5 cracker</a> - HashHack.com has over 21 million hashes online ,worth a look if your interested in MD5<br /><br />ThanksAdamhttp://www.hashhack.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6881326265222951171.post-9576882884840290572009-12-15T02:37:36.317+01:002009-12-15T02:37:36.317+01:00Does this version support a hash list file, or is this single only?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6881326265222951171.post-7943090094512775702009-08-27T06:49:51.408+02:002009-08-27T06:49:51.408+02:00Ran this code on a AMD Phenom x4 @2.6Ghz running Vista64. Yielded approximately 70 Mhashes/sec. Haven&#39;t tried compiling it myself to see if it makes any difference.colonelxc at the gmail thingnoreply@blogger.com