Comments on Distracted: Over 50% speed increase on the new EnTibr

I've Tried the same thing as Hans, it looks li...

2011-02-10T19:18:48.844+01:00

I've Tried the same thing as Hans,
it looks like on a ubuntu system the speed is much slower.
thank you very much for a very usefull/great program.

it goes less than 100 on ubuntu, around 180 on Win...

2011-01-16T21:23:26.251+01:00

it goes less than 100 on ubuntu, around 180 on Win7...
(using gcc 4.5 and mingw-gcc4.5)
would be good if someone could debug this... :(
(only tested on core i7 820...
oh, and 820 is 1 of the worst i7 processors :p)

Jimmy_W: shouldn't matter, every 64-windows ha...

2010-11-19T22:50:03.221+01:00

Jimmy_W: shouldn't matter, every 64-windows has a 32-bit "subsystem" or whatever you wanna call it, just compile it 32-bit..
as every modern processor, Xeon X5670 has the 32 instructions.

I checked with one of our coders. He said that E...

2010-09-09T22:01:55.100+02:00

I checked with one of our coders. He said that EnTibr's source also uses a separate set of code that was developed for running the multiple threads (pthread), and that code is not yet available as a 64-bit library. Hence, I guess that I'm running as optimally as I can for a 64-bit system. Still, the speed is incredible!

Thanks, Nikos. I do forensics- I'm not a code...

2010-08-26T03:58:24.215+02:00

Thanks, Nikos. I do forensics- I'm not a coder, so I have no experience in compiling source code. I will, however, check this out and see what I can learn.

Jimmy_W, if you recompile the source with Intel C+...

2010-08-24T12:40:16.450+02:00

Jimmy_W, if you recompile the source with Intel C++ Compiler, you will break 1 Bhashes/s. My estimation for your system is a speed of 1.1 BHashes/s

Hello, Daniel. I just ran EnTibr on our newest ma...

2010-08-22T23:47:03.750+02:00

Hello, Daniel. I just ran EnTibr on our newest machine. It's a Win 64, with 2, 6-core Xeon X5670s running at 2.93GHz with 24GB RAM. Using the lowerapha-numeric set with a length of 8, EnTibr was pushing 873 Mhashes/s at 24 threads!! Very impressive! I can send a screen shot if you wish.

Sources for GNU/Linux users : http://bobotig.fr/co...

2010-08-22T14:55:36.122+02:00

Sources for GNU/Linux users : http://bobotig.fr/contenu/programmes/EnTibr_0.3_src_gnulinux.7z

Great job and good continuation ;)

Daniel hi. The way you have compiled EnTibr, it ru...

2010-08-21T10:29:18.873+02:00

Daniel hi.
The way you have compiled EnTibr, it runs on processors without SSE2 (for example AthlonXP), but never find passwords.
I think you have to recompiled it in a way to prevent non-SSE2 processors to run it.

Would be nice a restore point like rracki :D But a...

2010-08-13T17:13:44.692+02:00

Would be nice a restore point like rracki :D
But anyway, thanks for the tool

jimmy, some combinations are easy to add to EnTibr...

2010-05-23T14:35:31.676+02:00

jimmy, some combinations are easy to add to EnTibr. but the way my brute forcers currently work do not allow a truly custom character set to be specified. Plaintext generation works with 1 to 3 ranges of characters, a range being for example 0x61-0x7A (lowercase). Any character set that you can compose of such 3 ranges is easy to implement currently.

Thanks for the answer, Daniel. Another question, ...

2010-05-23T00:39:52.683+02:00

Thanks for the answer, Daniel. Another question, if I may: is there a way to select a character set that, for example, uses lower-alpha plus special characters and the space?

thanks for the update. Length 7 - 11% in 11448.83...

2010-05-16T21:30:25.183+02:00

thanks for the update.
Length 7 - 11% in 11448.83 s (648.31 Mhashes/s)
getting some good speeds here on a stock i7 920. unfortunately this is going to take days :)

tnx for the speedpost jack, that matches mine :) ...

2010-04-19T17:04:22.411+02:00

tnx for the speedpost jack, that matches mine :)

Jimmy, nice speed as well.. and i'm sorry, no restore points

Thanks very much for writing EnTibr NTLM and impro...

2010-04-19T16:51:09.341+02:00

Thanks very much for writing EnTibr NTLM and improving it so much! I have two quad-xeons, X5570s at 2.93GHz and am getting 520 MPS! Question: is there a way to stop the program and then restart it from the same password?

Just though i'd post my speed on here. I curre...

2010-04-19T16:30:38.940+02:00

Just though i'd post my speed on here. I currently have an Intel Q9450 @ 3.2ghz with 6gb ram and i get 316.20 Mhashes/s

Cheers

Thanks amazing performance on my Q6600@3ghz, comme...

2010-03-28T12:36:16.241+02:00

Thanks amazing performance on my Q6600@3ghz, commercial software(elcomsoft) reaches 28Mhashes/s, your algorithm reached 130Mhashes/s.

Shame :( I've created one already but it takes...

2009-12-18T17:55:42.527+01:00

Shame :( I've created one already but it takes around 1 min to do upto 4 chars with alpha-numeric. LM needs upto 7 obviously.

hi md5decryptor admin, it's on my wish list......

2009-12-17T19:10:34.120+01:00

hi md5decryptor admin, it's on my wish list... but i'm pretty sure it'll just stay on that list :p

Love the projects :) but I've been thinking ab...

2009-12-16T12:22:58.631+01:00

Love the projects :) but I've been thinking about if you could create a LM brute forcer? This would be very handy and hopefully you can get it as fast as NTLM hashing in which case, simple alpha-numeric charset upto 7 chars would not take long at all. This would ultimatly mean I would not need my 24GB of rainbow tables, just your LM brute forcer ;)

i don't think so, at least not in the near fut...

2009-08-12T20:06:41.046+02:00

i don't think so, at least not in the near future.

off topic but any chance you could make a brute fo...

2009-08-12T16:04:20.954+02:00

off topic but any chance you could make a brute force tool to attack cisco IOS hashes?

thanks, that was my mistake, I forget -t 2.

2009-08-09T22:15:12.199+02:00

thanks, that was my mistake, I forget -t 2.

that seems a bit strange yes. so you are actually ...

2009-08-07T21:38:48.479+02:00

that seems a bit strange yes. so you are actually using -t 2 to use 2 threads and you start a job that's long enough?

at least the e8400 should be able to get about half my performance as it's like exactly the same cpu, just that mine has 4 cores instead of 2. E8400 is clocked at 3.0 Ghz, mine is overclocked to 3.2 Ghz. So i'd say you should be able to get like 140-150 Mhashes/s on that one.

I have e6750 on windows vista but my speed is only...

2009-08-07T18:16:41.569+02:00

I have e6750 on windows vista but my speed is only 72Mhashes/s. My CPU is only use at 50% on 2 threads. 60% for core1 and 40% for core 2. I have the same bug with a e8400 on windows xp.