tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6881326265222951171.post1296494594237582893..comments2022-12-05T19:28:18.502+01:00Comments on Distracted: Over 50% speed increase on the new EnTibrDaniel Niggebruggehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02053201958307619797noreply@blogger.comBlogger26125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6881326265222951171.post-57789963238500524232011-02-10T19:18:48.844+01:002011-02-10T19:18:48.844+01:00I've Tried the same thing as Hans,
it looks li...I've Tried the same thing as Hans,<br />it looks like on a ubuntu system the speed is much slower.<br />thank you very much for a very usefull/great program.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6881326265222951171.post-81150640633266131112011-01-16T21:23:26.251+01:002011-01-16T21:23:26.251+01:00it goes less than 100 on ubuntu, around 180 on Win...it goes less than 100 on ubuntu, around 180 on Win7...<br />(using gcc 4.5 and mingw-gcc4.5)<br />would be good if someone could debug this... :(<br />(only tested on core i7 820...<br />oh, and 820 is 1 of the worst i7 processors :p)Divinity76https://www.blogger.com/profile/13735574956426748863noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6881326265222951171.post-81649340859032034462010-11-19T22:50:03.221+01:002010-11-19T22:50:03.221+01:00Jimmy_W: shouldn't matter, every 64-windows ha...Jimmy_W: shouldn't matter, every 64-windows has a 32-bit "subsystem" or whatever you wanna call it, just compile it 32-bit..<br />as every modern processor, Xeon X5670 has the 32 instructions.Divinity76https://www.blogger.com/profile/13735574956426748863noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6881326265222951171.post-9627750226707389452010-09-09T22:01:55.100+02:002010-09-09T22:01:55.100+02:00I checked with one of our coders. He said that E...I checked with one of our coders. He said that EnTibr's source also uses a separate set of code that was developed for running the multiple threads (pthread), and that code is not yet available as a 64-bit library. Hence, I guess that I'm running as optimally as I can for a 64-bit system. Still, the speed is incredible!Jimmy_Wnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6881326265222951171.post-20907689431764683152010-08-26T03:58:24.215+02:002010-08-26T03:58:24.215+02:00Thanks, Nikos. I do forensics- I'm not a code...Thanks, Nikos. I do forensics- I'm not a coder, so I have no experience in compiling source code. I will, however, check this out and see what I can learn.Jimmy_Wnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6881326265222951171.post-22381604274829134472010-08-24T12:40:16.450+02:002010-08-24T12:40:16.450+02:00Jimmy_W, if you recompile the source with Intel C+...Jimmy_W, if you recompile the source with Intel C++ Compiler, you will break 1 Bhashes/s. My estimation for your system is a speed of 1.1 BHashes/sNikos Diamantisnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6881326265222951171.post-1894071896220036982010-08-22T23:47:03.750+02:002010-08-22T23:47:03.750+02:00Hello, Daniel. I just ran EnTibr on our newest ma...Hello, Daniel. I just ran EnTibr on our newest machine. It's a Win 64, with 2, 6-core Xeon X5670s running at 2.93GHz with 24GB RAM. Using the lowerapha-numeric set with a length of 8, EnTibr was pushing 873 Mhashes/s at 24 threads!! Very impressive! I can send a screen shot if you wish.Jimmy_Wnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6881326265222951171.post-23812019807124291462010-08-22T14:55:36.122+02:002010-08-22T14:55:36.122+02:00Sources for GNU/Linux users : http://bobotig.fr/co...Sources for GNU/Linux users : http://bobotig.fr/contenu/programmes/EnTibr_0.3_src_gnulinux.7z<br /><br />Great job and good continuation ;)BoboTiGhttp://www.bobotig.frnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6881326265222951171.post-32613918043987423402010-08-21T10:29:18.873+02:002010-08-21T10:29:18.873+02:00Daniel hi.
The way you have compiled EnTibr, it ru...Daniel hi.<br />The way you have compiled EnTibr, it runs on processors without SSE2 (for example AthlonXP), but never find passwords.<br />I think you have to recompiled it in a way to prevent non-SSE2 processors to run it.Nikos Diamantisnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6881326265222951171.post-72352264240573750872010-08-13T17:13:44.692+02:002010-08-13T17:13:44.692+02:00Would be nice a restore point like rracki :D
But a...Would be nice a restore point like rracki :D<br />But anyway, thanks for the toolAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6881326265222951171.post-14431572480951430652010-05-23T14:35:31.676+02:002010-05-23T14:35:31.676+02:00jimmy, some combinations are easy to add to EnTibr...jimmy, some combinations are easy to add to EnTibr. but the way my brute forcers currently work do not allow a truly custom character set to be specified. Plaintext generation works with 1 to 3 ranges of characters, a range being for example 0x61-0x7A (lowercase). Any character set that you can compose of such 3 ranges is easy to implement currently.Daniel Niggebruggehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02053201958307619797noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6881326265222951171.post-27719664469656764942010-05-23T00:39:52.683+02:002010-05-23T00:39:52.683+02:00Thanks for the answer, Daniel. Another question, ...Thanks for the answer, Daniel. Another question, if I may: is there a way to select a character set that, for example, uses lower-alpha plus special characters and the space?Jimmy_Wnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6881326265222951171.post-23692931533280186182010-05-16T21:30:25.183+02:002010-05-16T21:30:25.183+02:00thanks for the update.
Length 7 - 11% in 11448.83...thanks for the update. <br />Length 7 - 11% in 11448.83 s (648.31 Mhashes/s)<br />getting some good speeds here on a stock i7 920. unfortunately this is going to take days :)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6881326265222951171.post-15745212687601321502010-04-19T17:04:22.411+02:002010-04-19T17:04:22.411+02:00tnx for the speedpost jack, that matches mine :)
...tnx for the speedpost jack, that matches mine :)<br /><br />Jimmy, nice speed as well.. and i'm sorry, no restore pointsDaniel Niggebruggehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02053201958307619797noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6881326265222951171.post-59134560968001407352010-04-19T16:51:09.341+02:002010-04-19T16:51:09.341+02:00Thanks very much for writing EnTibr NTLM and impro...Thanks very much for writing EnTibr NTLM and improving it so much! I have two quad-xeons, X5570s at 2.93GHz and am getting 520 MPS! Question: is there a way to stop the program and then restart it from the same password?Jimmy_Wnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6881326265222951171.post-15836535251768205302010-04-19T16:30:38.940+02:002010-04-19T16:30:38.940+02:00Just though i'd post my speed on here. I curre...Just though i'd post my speed on here. I currently have an Intel Q9450 @ 3.2ghz with 6gb ram and i get 316.20 Mhashes/s<br /><br />CheersJacknoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6881326265222951171.post-79938613262181785972010-03-28T12:36:16.241+02:002010-03-28T12:36:16.241+02:00Thanks amazing performance on my Q6600@3ghz, comme...Thanks amazing performance on my Q6600@3ghz, commercial software(elcomsoft) reaches 28Mhashes/s, your algorithm reached 130Mhashes/s.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6881326265222951171.post-66169788946277462952009-12-18T17:55:42.527+01:002009-12-18T17:55:42.527+01:00Shame :( I've created one already but it takes...Shame :( I've created one already but it takes around 1 min to do upto 4 chars with alpha-numeric. LM needs upto 7 obviously.Blandyhttp://www.md5decrypter.co.uknoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6881326265222951171.post-15052321545524104022009-12-17T19:10:34.120+01:002009-12-17T19:10:34.120+01:00hi md5decryptor admin, it's on my wish list......hi md5decryptor admin, it's on my wish list... but i'm pretty sure it'll just stay on that list :pDaniel Niggebruggehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02053201958307619797noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6881326265222951171.post-10472895949160555772009-12-16T12:22:58.631+01:002009-12-16T12:22:58.631+01:00Love the projects :) but I've been thinking ab...Love the projects :) but I've been thinking about if you could create a LM brute forcer? This would be very handy and hopefully you can get it as fast as NTLM hashing in which case, simple alpha-numeric charset upto 7 chars would not take long at all. This would ultimatly mean I would not need my 24GB of rainbow tables, just your LM brute forcer ;)admin@md5decrypter.co.ukhttp://www.md5decrypter.co.uknoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6881326265222951171.post-81431735728603258652009-08-12T20:06:41.046+02:002009-08-12T20:06:41.046+02:00i don't think so, at least not in the near fut...i don't think so, at least not in the near future.Daniel Niggebruggehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02053201958307619797noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6881326265222951171.post-86815543470930344592009-08-12T16:04:20.954+02:002009-08-12T16:04:20.954+02:00off topic but any chance you could make a brute fo...off topic but any chance you could make a brute force tool to attack cisco IOS hashes?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6881326265222951171.post-13950154193813917802009-08-09T22:15:12.199+02:002009-08-09T22:15:12.199+02:00thanks, that was my mistake, I forget -t 2.thanks, that was my mistake, I forget -t 2.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6881326265222951171.post-86996902233451465852009-08-07T21:38:48.479+02:002009-08-07T21:38:48.479+02:00that seems a bit strange yes. so you are actually ...that seems a bit strange yes. so you are actually using -t 2 to use 2 threads and you start a job that's long enough?<br /><br />at least the e8400 should be able to get about half my performance as it's like exactly the same cpu, just that mine has 4 cores instead of 2. E8400 is clocked at 3.0 Ghz, mine is overclocked to 3.2 Ghz. So i'd say you should be able to get like 140-150 Mhashes/s on that one.Daniel Niggebruggehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02053201958307619797noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6881326265222951171.post-61074947526330103252009-08-07T18:16:41.569+02:002009-08-07T18:16:41.569+02:00I have e6750 on windows vista but my speed is only...I have e6750 on windows vista but my speed is only 72Mhashes/s. My CPU is only use at 50% on 2 threads. 60% for core1 and 40% for core 2. I have the same bug with a e8400 on windows xp.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com